Case study 03 · seed 804504527

WECS Community Operations

RoleCommunity Events Director WhereWomen in Engineering & Computer Science, UVic When2024-04 → now ToolsNotion, Forms, Sheets

Community events direction for Women in Engineering & Computer Science at UVic. An operations pipeline for planning, running, and measuring events, with feedback loops that actually close.

The real deliverable

Student clubs run on goodwill and improvisation, which works beautifully right up until the person holding everything in their head graduates. As Community Events Director for WECS, my actual job isn’t any single event. It’s building an operations system that makes good events repeatable by whoever comes next.

Note 1The test I hold myself to: could someone run our next event from the documentation alone? If the answer is no, the documentation is the task.

The pipeline

Every event runs through the same four steps.

The loop
PLANRUNMEASUREAPPLY
Step 01 · Plan

Craft & budget

Pick the semester’s craft, source and purchase supplies against a fixed budget, and cap the spot count to what that budget actually covers.

NOTION
Step 02 · Run

Wednesday, day-of

Events run on a Wednesday. I build the playlist and personally assist attendees at their stations throughout, so nothing stalls waiting on one person.

IN PERSON
Step 03 · Measure

Post-event survey

The same core questions every time, so results compare across events instead of floating alone.

FORMS → SHEETS
Step 04 · Apply

Applied-learnings note

One written paragraph: what the data says the next event should do differently.

→ BACK TO STEP 01
Lip gloss keychainsCrochet claw clip decoratingCompact mirror decoratingNecklace & bracelet charm making

A finding I didn’t expect

One craft event per semester, always on a Wednesday, always capped by budget — and they still pull noticeably harder than most other WECS events.

I don’t run these through partnerships with other clubs or industry sponsors. The whole loop is mine: pick the craft, buy the supplies, build the playlist, and stand at the tables helping people finish theirs. Spots are capped by budget, not demand, which is exactly why the survey and the applied-learnings note matter: every semester’s craft has to earn its slot against a real constraint, not just against how fun it sounded in a meeting.

Why this one matters

This is the least visual project on this site and the most representative of the work I want to do: quiet systems, honest measures, and documentation good enough to hand to a stranger. It is also the kind of work whose value grows with scale, which is exactly why I intend to keep doing it.

What actually happened

Per event
Event feedback loop
Post-event surveys collected and reviewed after each event, with findings applied to the next event's plan.
30–40 attendees
Turnout per craft event
Self-reported RSVP and day-of headcounts across four semesters of craft events I've run, compared informally against roughly 20 for other WECS events. Not independently audited, and spots are capped by budget, so this is turnout against a limited cap, not unconstrained demand.
Search & jumpesc